Case 6018125/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Wiggan v Trinity Primary Academy — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018125/2024
- Decision date
- 1 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Wiggan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford Employment Tribunal on 10 November 2025, Employment Judge Arullendran gave oral judgment in Mrs A Wiggan's case against Trinity Primary Academy. The tribunal struck out the direct age discrimination claim, the direct disability discrimination claim, and the indirect disability discrimination claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a), finding that each had no reasonable prospect of success.
The published judgment records only those strike-out orders and does not set out any compensatory findings or monetary award. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Direct age discrimination claim struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect disability discrimination claim struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.