Case 6018168/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Baesjou v T S Lee & Son Ltd t/a CPR Skip Hire — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018168/2024
- Decision date
- 26 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McAvoy Newns
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Baesjou
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds Employment Tribunal via CVP on 26 September 2025 before Employment Judge McAvoy Newns. The Claimant, Ms S Baesjou, did not attend. The Respondent, T S Lee & Son Ltd t/a CPR Skip Hire, was represented by Ms Lewis, Consultant.
The judgment records that, for the reasons given orally during the hearing, the Claimant's claims were dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. No substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim are set out in the written text provided, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that the Claimant's claims were dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The underlying claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category supplied in the case context. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of Schedule 1 to The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.