Case 6018187/2024 · Employment Tribunal
C Mooney v Salon 1606 Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018187/2024
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Mooney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 11 November 2024 and the respondent did not present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Phil Allen therefore determined the claim under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure without a respondent response.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £3,462.00 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £865.50 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £259.36, and that the respondent had breached the claimant's contract in relation to travel costs and ordered damages of £1,680.00. The total sum payable was £6,266.86.
The judgment includes the standard tribunal notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that interest would not be payable if the award was paid within 14 days of the decision day and that interest would otherwise run from 26 July 2025 at 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £3,462 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for notice following dismissal in breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £866 |
| Holiday pay | Award for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £259 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for travel costs under the contract. | Upheld | — | £1,680 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,267
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 Article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.