Case 6018237/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms I Olasunmade v Todmorden Residential Homes Limited T/A Waterside Lodge Care Home — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018237/2024
- Decision date
- 25 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms I Olasunmade
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds on 25 June 2025, before Employment Judge Shepherd, the tribunal heard Ms I Olasunmade's claims against Todmorden Residential Homes Limited T/A Waterside Lodge Care Home. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Munro, solicitor.
The claim for outstanding accrued holiday pay succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,155.44 in respect of that claim.
The separate claim of unauthorised deduction from wages, brought in respect of unpaid hours, was found not well-founded and was dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claim for outstanding accrued holiday pay succeeded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,155.44. | Upheld | — | £1,155 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of unpaid hours was found not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,155
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.