Case 6018356/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. M Naseer v Erp Savvy Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018356/2025
- Decision date
- 12 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. M Naseer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Midlands East Employment Tribunal on 16 May 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response in time, and Employment Judge Heap determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that a determination could properly be made on the claim or part of it without a hearing. The hearing listed for 5 September 2025 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £24,999.99 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,715.38.
The judgment records a total sum payable to the claimant of £26,715.37. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Heap on 12 August 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award stated as £24,999.99 gross; rounded down to nearest GBP integer. | Upheld | — | £24,999 |
| Holiday pay | Award stated as £1,715.38; rounded down to nearest GBP integer. Judgment treats this under holiday entitlement (Working Time Regulations). | Upheld | — | £1,715 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,715
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.