Case 6018358/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Sonya Elliott v Brackenwood Windows Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018358/2024
- Decision date
- 2 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beever Appearances
- Venue
- by CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Sonya Elliott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mrs Sonya Elliott was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time, being 3 June 2024 to 26 July 2024. That finding was made in consequence of a stroke suffered on 25 February 2024.
The extracted judgment text does not set out any further liability findings, remedy assessment, or monetary award. It records that oral reasons were given on 10 September 2025 and that written reasons would not be produced unless requested under Rule 60(4) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time of 3 June 2024 to 26 July 2024, in consequence of a stroke suffered on 25 February 2024. No liability finding or remedy is set out in the provided text. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Rule 60(4) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.