Case 6018427/2025 · Employment Tribunal
J Barrett v Mr K Donald, and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018427/2025
- Decision date
- 28 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
J Barrett
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 17 May 2025. The tribunal recorded that the respondents failed to present a valid response on time and, under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure, decided that the claim could properly be determined without a response.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the respondents had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £230 gross. It also found that the claimant’s holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered payment of £1,021.23 gross.
The total sum ordered was £1,251.23 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £230 gross. | Upheld | — | £230 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,021.23 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,021 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,251
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.