Case 6018428/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Hartshorn v Select Support Partnerships Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018428/2025
- Decision date
- 29 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Hartshorn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds by CVP on 16 July 2025, Employment Judge Shulman dealt with Mr S Hartshorn's holiday pay and unlawful deduction claims against Select Support Partnerships Limited. The reasons record that the holiday pay issue had been reduced to a balance of £2.76 after the respondent had paid the rest, and that one unlawful deduction claim was withdrawn because HMRC agreed to reimburse the claimant.
The only live issue left was the £319.95 unlawful deduction claim. The tribunal found that recovery of that sum was a clerical and administrative matter, that the parties had made attempts during an adjourned period to establish whether HMRC would make payment, and that the respondent had obtained a collector reference number indicating the claimant should recover the sum from Universal Credit.
Because receipt of the money would take time, the tribunal adjourned the hearing sine die rather than make a final merits determination. It recorded that if the claimant receives the £319.95 the claim will not return to the tribunal, and if the money is not received either party may come back to the tribunal. No monetary award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment says the respondent had paid all holiday pay save for £2.76, and the claimant withdrew the balance due. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records this claim as £142.60 in the claims section, but £146.20 in the issues section; it says the claimant withdrew the claim after HMRC agreed to reimburse him. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The only claim left was for £319.95. The tribunal adjourned the hearing sine die so the parties could return if the money was not received; if it was received, the claim would not come back to the tribunal. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.