Case 6018510/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Farah v Mo’s Lounge Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018510/2025
- Decision date
- 7 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burge Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Farah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay the Claimant the full amount of wages and holiday pay due for the period 25 December 2024 to 14 January 2025.
The Respondent did not attend the CVP hearing. The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £1,726.03, described as the total gross sum deducted. Written reasons were not included in the judgment, with reasons stated to have been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the respondent made unauthorised deductions by failing to pay the full amount of wages and holiday pay due for 25 December 2024 to 14 January 2025. The award is given as a single gross sum and is not split between wages and holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,726 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay is expressly included in the unauthorised deductions finding, but the judgment does not state a separate holiday pay amount. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,726
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.