Case 6018563/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Samantha Price v R1 Greater Healthcare Services Ltd R2 Beyond Care Solutions Ltd HELD AT: Newcastle/ CVP — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018563/2025
- Decision date
- 26 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Booth REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Booth heard this claim in the absence of both respondents, neither of which submitted a response. The tribunal found the claimant was employed by the first respondent, Greater Healthcare Services Ltd, to work for the second respondent, Beyond Care Solutions Ltd. The complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was not well-founded: although the respondents' conduct (failing to pay full September 2024 wages and subsequent non-payments) amounted to a fundamental breach, the claimant had already decided to resign before that breach in connection with her new full-time employment with Rainton H Group Ltd starting 1 July 2024, and she affirmed the contract by delaying resignation until 12 December 2024. Three heads of unauthorised deductions from wages were upheld, totalling £10,920: unpaid wages September to December 2024 (£7,442), accrued but untaken holiday pay for 23.75 days (£2,850), and pension contributions deducted but not remitted to NEST (£628). Payment ordered within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £7,442 |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £2,850 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £628 |
Legal tests applied
3 referencesRemedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,920
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.