Case 6018563/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Samantha Price v R1 Greater Healthcare Services Ltd R2 Beyond Care Solutions Ltd HELD AT: Newcastle/ CVP — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018563/2025
- Decision date
- 26 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Booth REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Samantha Price
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Booth heard this claim in the absence of both respondents, neither of which submitted a response. The tribunal found the claimant was employed by the first respondent, Greater Healthcare Services Ltd, to work for the second respondent, Beyond Care Solutions Ltd. The complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was not well-founded: although the respondents' conduct (failing to pay full September 2024 wages and subsequent non-payments) amounted to a fundamental breach, the claimant had already decided to resign before that breach in connection with her new full-time employment with Rainton H Group Ltd starting 1 July 2024, and she affirmed the contract by delaying resignation until 12 December 2024. Three heads of unauthorised deductions from wages were upheld, totalling £10,920: unpaid wages September to December 2024 (£7,442), accrued but untaken holiday pay for 23.75 days (£2,850), and pension contributions deducted but not remitted to NEST (£628). Payment ordered within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal not well-founded: although respondents' conduct amounted to a fundamental breach of contract, the claimant's decision to resign was made before that breach (in connection with new employment with Rainton H Group Ltd) and in any event she affirmed the contract by delaying resignation. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages September to December 2024 from the first respondent. | Upheld | — | £7,442 |
| Holiday pay | 23.75 days accrued but untaken holiday in December 2024. | Upheld | — | £2,850 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Pension contributions deducted from claimant's pay but not paid into NEST scheme; series of deductions per Bear Scotland Ltd v Fulton [2015] ICR 221. | Upheld | — | £628 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,920
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.14 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Bear Scotland Ltd v Fulton [2015] ICR 221
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.