Joanne Carpenter v Daniel Wilson — 2025

Case reference: 6018589/2024
Decision date: 17 September 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Richardson REPRESENTATION

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Joanne Carpenter

Respondent

Daniel Wilson

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Claimant, Joanne Carpenter, brought a complaint against Daniel Wilson concerning payment on termination for accrued but untaken annual leave. Employment Judge Richardson heard the case at Southampton by CVP on 29 August 2025.

The Tribunal held that the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit. It found that it was reasonably practicable for the complaint to have been presented in time.

On that basis, the complaint in respect of unpaid annual leave was dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal rules.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Holiday pay	The Tribunal held that the complaint about failure to pay accrued but untaken annual leave on termination was presented outside the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so within time.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.