Case 6018591/2025 · Employment Tribunal
G Stringer v Nazia Goder & Soheil Goder — 2026
- Case reference
- 6018591/2025
- Decision date
- 18 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
G Stringer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 19 May 2025. The respondents failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge M Butler decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that Nazia Goder and Soheil Goder had made unauthorised deductions from G Stringer's wages. It ordered the respondents to pay the claimant £875.16 gross, and recorded the same figure as the total gross sum payable. The interest notice recorded 10 June 2026 as the relevant decision day, 11 June 2026 as the calculation day, and 8% per annum as the stipulated rate, but the judgment did not quantify any interest award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the respondents made unauthorised deductions from wages and must pay the claimant £875.16 gross. | Upheld | — | £875 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £875
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.