Case 6018619/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Watson v Synergy Logistics Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6018619/2024
- Decision date
- 11 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Watson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an application for interim relief in the Employment Tribunal brought by Mr M Watson against Synergy Logistics Limited. The hearing took place at Nottingham on 10 December 2024 before Employment Judge M Butler sitting alone, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr R Kerr, Consultant.
The tribunal's judgment records a single operative decision: the claimant's application for interim relief was refused. The extract does not set out any substantive findings on the underlying claim, and no monetary award is recorded.
The judgment also records that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing. It states that written reasons would not be provided unless a party applied in writing within 14 days of the judgment being sent to them.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claimant's application for interim relief was refused. The extract states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be given unless a written application was made within 14 days. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.