Case 6018776/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Sayers v B.S. Steels Limited (in Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018776/2024
- Decision date
- 22 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Volkmer Representation
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Sayers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr L Sayers, had started employment on 31 August 2020 and the effective date of termination was 17 July 2024. The hearing was held at Exeter by CVP on 3 April 2025 before Employment Judge Volkmer, and the respondent did not attend. The written judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well founded and is upheld.
The remedy schedule records a basic award of £3,150.00, calculated by reference to 4.5 qualifying weeks at a gross weekly pay figure of £700.00. It also records damages for wrongful dismissal of £4,012.44, based on four weeks of net weekly pay of £1,003.11.
For the compensatory award, the tribunal recorded immediate loss of £37,598.81 made up of 33.1 weeks' net earnings, loss of statutory rights, pension and bonus. That figure was then increased by £5,639.82, described as a 15% adjustment for failure by the employer to follow statutory procedures, producing a compensatory award of £43,238.63. The summary total was £50,401.07, stated to be within the compensation cap of £115,115.00, and the award was ordered to be paid within 14 days of the order being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment expressly states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well founded and upheld. The calculation schedule shows a basic award of £3,150.00 and a compensatory award of £43,238.63 after a 15% adjustment for failure by the employer to follow statutory procedures. | Upheld | — | £46,389 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The calculation schedule includes damages for wrongful dismissal of £4,012.44. The opening judgment paragraph does not separately set out a liability paragraph for this head of claim, but it is included in the summary totals. | Upheld | — | £4,012 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £50,401
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,150
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £43,239
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.