Case 6018838/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend For the v Mr Lee Cooper (Director) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018838/2024
- Decision date
- 22 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Morgan Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim before the tribunal was a complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages against Ernest Cooper Ltd. The final hearing was listed for 22 May 2025 in Leeds by CVP, but the Claimant did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal therefore dealt first with whether the hearing should proceed and ultimately dismissed the claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024.
The tribunal found that the Claimant had received the Notice of Hearing dated 4 March 2025 via the Portal. It relied on the fact that he had contacted the tribunal on 22 April 2025 to ask for the tribunal email address so that he could send evidence, and the tribunal had replied with that address. No further communication was received from the Claimant after that date. He did not notify the tribunal that he would not attend, and no postponement application was received.
The tribunal and clerks attempted to contact him during the hearing by telephone and email. The telephone number in the ET1 was no longer active, no voicemail could be left, and emails sent to the Claimant did not produce any response or bounce-back. The Respondent confirmed that it had received no communication about the Claimant's absence and that the last communication it had received from him, apart from the ET1, was on 6 November 2024.
In deciding to dismiss under Rule 47, the tribunal also took into account that the Claimant had not complied with the directions in the Notice of Hearing. He had not sent a schedule of loss, supporting documents or evidence to the Respondent or the tribunal, and he had not provided a witness statement. The tribunal considered that it appeared the Claimant no longer wished to pursue the claim and dismissed it as consistent with the overriding objective.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 because the Claimant did not attend or be represented at the final hearing and had not complied with hearing directions. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.