Case 6018842/2025 · Employment Tribunal
S Conway-Folds v Adarga Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018842/2025
- Decision date
- 20 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Siddall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S Conway-Folds
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the London South Employment Tribunal on 20 May 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that the claim could properly be decided without a hearing. The listed hearing on 6 October 2025 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £18,333.32 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £1,438, calculated on the basis of two years' service, age 31 at dismissal, and a weekly pay cap of £719. The respondent was further ordered to pay £2,291.63 gross for unpaid holiday entitlement.
The total sum the respondent was ordered to pay was £22,062.95. The judgment notes that the claimant is responsible for accounting to HMRC for any sums owed in respect of the payments received.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages; respondent ordered to pay £18,333.32 gross. | Upheld | — | £18,333 |
| Redundancy | Claimant dismissed by reason of redundancy; statutory redundancy payment of £1,438 (2 weeks pay capped at £719). | Upheld | — | £1,438 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement; ordered to pay £2,291.63 gross. Classified as holiday_pay rather than working_time as the award is specifically for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £2,292 |
| Breach of contract | Listed on gov.uk under Breach of Contract but the judgment does not separately adjudicate or quantify a breach of contract claim distinct from the wages, redundancy and holiday awards. Outcome recorded as other due to absence of explicit determination in the judgment text. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,063
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.