Case 6018915/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Stopford Mackay v Buy & Go Cars Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018915/2024
- Decision date
- 12 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Evans Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Stopford Mackay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal corrected the respondent's name to BUY & GO CARS LIMITED and stated that the reference to SERVET BUDAK (BuyAndGOCarsLTD) was incorrect. It dismissed the claimant's complaints of automatically unfair dismissal based on assertion of statutory rights and wrongful dismissal/breach of contract as not well-founded.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay 216.75, net of lawful deductions for income tax and National Insurance. It also ordered the respondent to pay 1,944.80 for failing to provide written particulars of employment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment describes this as automatically unfair dismissal based on assertion of statutory rights and says it was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as wrongful dismissal/breach of contract and says it was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment groups wrongful dismissal and breach of contract together and dismisses that complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment says the unauthorised deduction from wages claim was well-founded and orders payment of 216.75 net of lawful deductions for income tax and National Insurance. The text refers once to the 'Second Claimant's wages', but only one claimant is otherwise listed. | Upheld | — | £217 |
| Other | The judgment orders payment of 1944.80 for failing to provide written particulars of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,945 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,162
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.