Case 6019031/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Wogan v FM Empire Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019031/2024
- Decision date
- 7 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bann Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Wogan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge J Bann heard this case at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 7 April 2025. The claimant, Mr G Wogan, appeared in person; the respondent, FM Empire Ltd, was represented by its director Mr Q Branson. The tribunal considered a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages.
The tribunal found the complaint well-founded, holding that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period 21-25 October 2024. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum deducted, being £697.50, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The judgment does not record any separate adjudication on a breach of contract claim despite the gov.uk listing including that category.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 21-25 October 2024; tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum deducted, with claimant responsible for tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £698 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £698
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.