Case 6019128/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Leslie Jordan v 0970003 Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) Heard: in private by CVP — 2026
- Case reference
- 6019128/2025
- Decision date
- 22 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Leslie Jordan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Leslie Jordan’s unfair dismissal claim against 0970003 Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation), previously known as Next Level Security Services Ltd. Jordan worked as a Static Security Officer from 20 November 2024 until his dismissal on 28 April 2025. The respondent did not attend the hearing or have a representative present. The tribunal based its findings on Jordan’s unchallenged oral evidence and the claim and response forms.
There was no running drinking water at the warehouse site in Scarborough where Jordan worked. Other contractors supplied bottled water for their staff, but the respondent did not. There was no health and safety representative on site and no evidence of a safety committee, so Jordan asked his manager to provide water. After raising his concerns, he was told that he was being dismissed and had taken the water issue out of proportion. The tribunal found that Jordan reasonably believed the lack of drinking water was potentially harmful to health and safety, and that raising those concerns was the principal reason for his dismissal. His dismissal fell within section 100(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, so he did not need two years’ service to bring the claim.
Jordan was out of work for three months before finding alternative employment. He sought three months’ lost earnings and did not seek reinstatement or reengagement. Using his net monthly earnings of £1,550, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a compensatory award of £4,650 for unfair dismissal. No basic award or other monetary component was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The principal reason for dismissal was raising health and safety concerns within section 100(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £4,650 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,650
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,650
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- Section 94 Employment Rights Act 1996: right not to be unfairly dismissed
- Section 100(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996: dismissal for raising health and safety concerns
- Section 108(1) and (3)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996: exception to the two-year qualifying period
- Section 123(1) Employment Rights Act 1996: just and equitable compensation for loss attributable to dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.