Case 6019186/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Sandra Messi v Revolute Limited and 4 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019186/2024
- Decision date
- 21 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill Representation
Parties
6 namedClaimant
Miss Sandra Messi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the Claimant’s application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 against the First and/or Second Respondent at East London Hearing Centre by video and telephone on 20 February 2025, before Employment Judge Crosfill.
The only recorded outcome was that the application was not well founded and was dismissed. The judgment does not set out any separate monetary award, and no further reasons are given in the extracted text beyond that disposition.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 against the First and/or Second Respondent was dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.