Case 6019200/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Ling v Collection Pot Limited and 3 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019200/2025
- Decision date
- 12 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burge Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr R Ling
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 12 June 2025 before Employment Judge Burge, the tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. The written record gives no substantive reasons and does not set out findings on liability, because the matter did not proceed to a reasoned determination.
The judgment text provided does not identify the specific legal cause of action within the decision itself, so the extracted claim is recorded as other. No remedy was awarded or assessed in the written record, and no legal test was cited in the decision text.
The record also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing or by written request within 14 days. On the face of the supplied text, the outcome was a disposal following withdrawal rather than a merits determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment records only that the claimant's claim was dismissed upon withdrawal; no substantive findings or specific cause of action are stated in the text provided. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.