Case 6019213/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Q Mema v Brentford Property Investments Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6019213/2024
- Decision date
- 20 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Yardley Date
Parties
2 namedMr Q Mema
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent admitted liability at a preliminary hearing for the claimant's claims for notice pay, statutory redundancy pay and accrued but untaken holiday pay. The parties agreed the total sum due was £17,561.25, comprising £5,786.25 notice pay, £10,150 statutory redundancy pay, and £2,125 holiday pay less £500 already paid. The claimant withdrew the unfair dismissal claim in light of those admissions.
The respondent indicated it was experiencing financial difficulties and that certain properties were in receivership. Proceedings were stayed briefly to allow ACAS conciliation, but settlement was not achieved. The Tribunal noted that its function was to determine claims and issue judgments reflecting liability and quantum, and that the respondent's ability or inability to pay did not prevent it from doing so.
The Tribunal accordingly ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £17,561.25, with any enforcement or insolvency matters falling outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
4 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Upheld | — | £10,150 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld | — | £5,786 |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £1,625 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,561
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.