Case 6019256/2024 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Mr C Taylor (Director) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019256/2024
- Decision date
- 28 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Kenward, sitting alone at Manchester by video on 27 and 28 November 2025, found that the Claimant was employed by the Respondent from 1 November 2020 to 4 August 2024. The complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and succeeded, and the Claimant was held to be entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,678.08. Compensation for unfair dismissal was awarded in the sum of £1,028.74, with no additional basic award given that a redundancy payment had been made; the compensatory award comprised a prescribed element of £528.74 (loss of earnings from 25 August 2024 to 28 November 2025) and a non-prescribed element of £500 for loss of statutory rights.
The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded; the Respondent was ordered to pay £1,342.46 in damages, calculated on gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the Claimant would have to pay tax on it as post-employment notice pay. The Tribunal also found that the Respondent had been in breach of its duty to provide the Claimant with a written statement of employment particulars and, in accordance with section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, ordered the Respondent to pay two weeks' gross pay in the sum of £1,342.46.
The complaint in respect of holiday pay was found not to be well-founded and was dismissed. The total amount payable by the Respondent to the Claimant was recorded as £5,394.71, with the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 applying to the prescribed element of £528.74.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Compensatory award of £1,028.74 comprising prescribed element (loss of earnings 25 August 2024 to 28 November 2025) of £528.74 and non-prescribed element (loss of statutory rights) of £500. No additional basic award as a redundancy payment was made. | Upheld | — | £1,029 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment of £1,678.08 ordered. | Upheld | — | £1,678 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for breach of contract in relation to notice pay of £1,342.46, calculated on gross pay to reflect likely tax on post-employment notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,342 |
| Other | Breach of the duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars; award of two weeks' gross pay (£1,342.46) under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,342 |
| Holiday pay | Complaint in respect of holiday pay not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,395
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,029
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 38 Employment Act 2002
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.