Case 6019286/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Holubieva v ARC Catering & Events Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019286/2024
- Decision date
- 6 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Holubieva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Buzzard, sitting alone at Liverpool by video on 25 February 2025, determined three complaints brought by Miss A Holubieva against ARC Catering & Events Ltd. The respondent did not file a defence and did not appear. The judgment was sent to the parties on 6 March 2025.
The tribunal found the breach of contract complaint in relation to notice pay well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £436.16, calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the sum would be treated as Post Employment Notice Pay. The holiday pay complaint was also well-founded: the tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay for holiday accrued but untaken at termination, and awarded £91.52. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded in respect of 12 hours and 40 minutes worked in the claimant's final week, with £144.95 gross awarded.
Written reasons were not provided, reasons having been given orally at the hearing. The notice under Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 records a relevant decision day of 6 March 2025, a calculation day of 7 March 2025, and a stipulated rate of interest of 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay; £436.16 gross awarded as damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £436 |
| Holiday pay | Treated by the tribunal as an unauthorised deduction from wages for accrued but untaken holiday; £91.52 awarded. | Upheld | — | £92 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages for 12 hours 40 minutes worked in the final week of employment; £144.95 gross awarded. | Upheld | — | £145 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £673
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.