Case 6019312/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Singh v Boots Hearingcare Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019312/2024
- Decision date
- 5 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Wales (Prestatyn) on 18 August 2025, before Employment Judge Shotter sitting alone, the tribunal heard the claimant's claim against Boots Hearingcare Limited. The written record states that the claimant was not treated less favourably because of his protected characteristic of race and/or ethnicity.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the claimant's direct discrimination claims brought under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010. The record does not set out further written reasons because the reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note appended to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states the claimant was not treated less favourably because of his protected characteristic of race and/or ethnicity and that his direct discrimination claims under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 13 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.