Case 6019387/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D. Chappell (lay representative) For the v EXPD8 Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 6019387/2025
- Decision date
- 4 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr D.
- Venue
- Swansea
Parties
2 namedMr D. Chappell (lay representative) For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge David Harris, sitting alone in Swansea, found that the claimant succeeded in her claims that the respondent failed to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20, 21 and 39(5) of the Equality Act 2010, and that her dismissal on 20 May 2025 was unfair. Claims of breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages and discrimination arising from disability were dismissed upon withdrawal, the GDPR claim was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and the harassment claim under section 26 EqA 2010 was dismissed.
The Tribunal awarded £12,100 for injury to feelings in respect of the failure to make reasonable adjustments and a compensatory award of £1,689.83 for unfair dismissal (loss of earnings 20 May to 31 August 2025 of £1,384.35 gross plus £305.48 loss of statutory rights). Interest of £303.75 was awarded at 4% from 24 May 2025 to 11 December 2025. The total award was £14,093.58.
Claims and outcomes
7 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Other | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Upheld | Disability | £12,100 |
| Unfair dismissal | Upheld | — | £1,690 |
| Harassment | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 referencesRemedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,094
- Compensatory award
- £1,690
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.