Loading page content.
TopClaim pillar
No harassment cases have been classified yet. As judgments are published on gov.uk and processed through our extractor, they will appear on this page.
| Outcome | Claims | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | 2,857 | 59% |
| Upheld | 682 | 14% |
| Other | 544 | 11% |
| Struck out | 474 | 10% |
| Withdrawn | 278 | 6% |
| Settled | 2 | 0% |
| Case ref. | Decided | Claimant | Primary respondent | Jurisdiction | Total award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No harassment cases classified yet — try the full taxonomy. | |||||
Cases on this page are identified by first-pass extraction against the locked §4.4 claim-type taxonomy — a judgment enters the harassment caseload if harassmentis tagged in its classification output. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Per-claim outcomes come from the second-pass (LLM-assisted) extraction and are recorded for each claim a judgment decides; the success rate counts only claims a tribunal decided on the merits (upheld or dismissed). Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are excluded from the compensation figures. Regional splits follow the tribunal's jurisdiction as recorded on gov.uk. Nothing on this page is legal advice or a prediction of any outcome; for any specific matter the gov.uk judgment PDF linked from each case page is the authoritative source.