Case 6019444/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Mr George Jeakins v East London Bus & Coach Company Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6019444/2026
- Decision date
- 23 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr George Jeakins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr George Jeakins applied for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in connection with his dismissal by East London Bus & Coach Company Limited (t/a Stagecoach).
The Tribunal found that it was not likely to conclude at the Final Hearing that the reason, or principal reason, for the dismissal was one specified in section 100(1)(a) or (b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It therefore dismissed the interim relief application. The judgment did not finally determine the underlying unfair dismissal claim and recorded no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The dismissal relates only to the claimant's application for interim relief under section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996. The underlying unfair dismissal claim was not finally determined by this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Likely to succeed test for interim relief under section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 100(1)(a) and (b) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.