Case 6019469/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Jenna Cotteral v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019469/2024
- Decision date
- 31 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McTigue
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jenna Cotteral
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing at Nottingham on 31 July 2025. The respondent was represented by Miss Martin of Counsel.
The Tribunal struck out the claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(c) because the claimant had not complied with Tribunal orders, and under Rule 38(1)(d) because the claim had not been actively pursued. The written judgment does not provide further reasons or address remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(c) and Rule 38(1)(d). It does not set out the detailed pleaded issues. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment records that the claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(c) and Rule 38(1)(d). It does not set out the detailed pleaded issues or identify a protected characteristic for this head of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(c)
- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.