Case 6019563/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Sean March v Adarga Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6019563/2025
- Decision date
- 10 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Sean March
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 10 August 2026, Employment Judge Gardiner struck out Mr Sean March’s claim against Adarga Limited under Rule 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 because it was not being actively pursued. Following Regional Employment Judge Burgher’s review of the case file, the Tribunal wrote to the parties on 29 June 2026 about the proposed strike-out. The letter referred to the lack of active pursuit and the respondent’s statement that the amounts claimed had been paid.
The claimant was given until 6 July 2026 to object by providing reasons or requesting a hearing at which to give them. He did not respond by that deadline or at all. The Tribunal therefore concluded that he was not actively pursuing his claim and struck it out on that basis. The hearing scheduled for 12 August 2026 was to be vacated. The judgment records no monetary award and gives no figure for the payments reported by the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type or distinguish separate causes of action. The claim as a whole was struck out because it was not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.