Case 6019607/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E L Loghin v EF Bakers Ltd C/O CHAWDA, Kavita Niranjan — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019607/2025
- Decision date
- 27 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E L Loghin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 27 May 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,043.52 gross. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Livesey on 11 February 2026 and sent to the parties on 16 March 2026.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 determination following the respondent's failure to present a valid response in time. | Upheld | — | £1,044 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,044
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.