Case 6019612/2024 · Employment Tribunal
K Doherty v Paul’s Quality Meats Ltd and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019612/2024
- Decision date
- 18 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
3 namedClaimant
K Doherty
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim brought by K Doherty against Paul’s Quality Meats Ltd and Victoria Lowcock. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued.
By a letter dated 7 August 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The tribunal recorded that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge KM Ross ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying heads of claim; it records only that the claim as a whole was struck out for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.