Case 6019627/2024 · Employment Tribunal
A Shawcross v Greens Enterprises Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019627/2024
- Decision date
- 10 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Shawcross
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claim was presented in the Bristol Employment Tribunal and that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. On that basis, the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered Greens Enterprises Ltd to pay the claimant £4,101.98 gross. It also upheld the claim relating to holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,678.30.
The judgment states that the respondent must pay the claimant £5,780.28 in total. The extracted text records the claim as presented on 24 November 2025, which is inconsistent with the judgment date shown elsewhere in the text; that date has been treated as recorded in the source rather than resolved.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the tribunal made a determination under rule 22. The respondent was ordered to pay £4,101.98 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £4,102 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the tribunal made a determination under rule 22. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,678.30 for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,678 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,780
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.