Case 6019769/2024 · Employment Tribunal
N Andrew v Inspire Community Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019769/2024
- Decision date
- 8 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N Andrew
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Liverpool by CVP on 17 March 2025, Employment Judge Shotter sitting alone dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim brought under sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records that the dismissal was of the unfair dismissal claim only.
The tribunal expressly stated that this outcome did not affect the claimant's complaints of disability discrimination, including a discriminatory dismissal. No findings on those complaints are contained in this written judgment.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no remedy calculation is set out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim brought under sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment states that this did not affect the claimant's complaints of disability discrimination, including discriminatory dismissal, which were not determined in this decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.