Case 6019790/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Beblowska v Darlington Delicatessen Limited HELD AT: Newcastle — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019790/2024
- Decision date
- 27 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moss REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Beblowska
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Moss, sitting alone at Newcastle on 27 January 2025, heard the claim brought by Ms A Beblowska against Darlington Delicatessen Limited. The claimant appeared in person and there was no appearance by the respondent. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not to be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal found that the claimant's claim for statutory redundancy pay was well founded and ordered the respondent to pay £5,382.54, calculated on gross weekly earnings of £316.62 multiplied by 17 (one week's pay x 11 and 1.5 week's pay x 4). The tribunal also found that the claim for unpaid statutory notice pay was well founded and ordered the respondent to pay the net sum of £3,550.20.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy pay claim found well founded; calculated on gross weekly earnings of £316.62 multiplied by 17 (1 week's pay x 11 and 1.5 week's pay x 4). | Upheld | — | £5,383 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for unpaid statutory notice pay found well founded; respondent ordered to pay the net sum of £3,550.20. | Upheld | — | £3,550 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,933
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.