Case 6019792/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Abdirauf Hussein v Staffline Recruitment Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6019792/2024
- Decision date
- 4 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Abdirauf Hussein
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Abdirauf Hussein's claim against Staffline Recruitment LTD. The judgment did not identify the claim's substantive legal basis or decide its merits.
The Tribunal had warned Hussein on 23 December 2025 that it was considering striking out the claim because he had not complied with Tribunal orders dated 18 December 2024 and 24 June 2025, and the claim had not been actively pursued. Hussein did not reply, explain why the claim should continue, or request a hearing. Employment Judge Edmonds found that the grounds under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 applied and that striking out the claim accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the claim's substantive legal basis. The gov.uk listing category is Working Time Regulations, but that classification cannot be verified from the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.