Case 6019817/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Andrew Haigh v Eddie Stobart Limited AT A HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019817/2024
- Decision date
- 14 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Andrew Haigh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAndrew Haigh brought a claim against Eddie Stobart Limited, with the respondent's title amended from Culina Stobart Ltd. The case was heard at Leeds on 4 and 9 July 2025 before Employment Judge Lancaster, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The written judgment records only the formal outcome: the claim was dismissed. It also records that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing. The written record does not set out those reasons, and it states that written reasons will not be provided unless a written request is made within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No separate remedy was recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.