Case 6019836/2024 · Employment Tribunal
L Preece v Larentia Capital Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019836/2024
- Decision date
- 28 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Preece
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Wales Employment Tribunal on 26 November 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that the claim could properly be decided under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
On the merits recorded in the judgment, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £137.70 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £344.00. The tribunal stated that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due, and the total sum payable was £481.70.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was found to have made unauthorised deductions from wages and was ordered to pay £137.70 gross. | Upheld | — | £138 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent was found to have failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £344.00. | Upheld | — | £344 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £482
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.