Case 6019852/2024 · Employment Tribunal
G Staples v The Ebdon Arms C/O Louise Cheeseman — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019852/2024
- Decision date
- 13 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray
Parties
2 namedClaimant
G Staples
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 20 September 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's orders dated 1 May 2025 and 30 June 2025, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Gray held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment was approved on 10 October 2025 and sent to the parties on 13 October 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that 'the claim is struck out' after the claimant failed to make written representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 20 September 2025. The judgment does not specify the underlying pleaded causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.