Case 6019853/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Jolanda Fouche v The Knowledge Academy Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019853/2024
- Decision date
- 12 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Winfield Representation
- Venue
- Cloud Video Platform
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Jolanda Fouche
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Jolanda Fouche’s claim against The Knowledge Academy Ltd was heard by Employment Judge Winfield on 26 September 2025 by Cloud Video Platform. The written record states only that the claim was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal rules.
No monetary award was made. The record does not set out any substantive findings on liability, nor does it allocate the jurisdiction ruling between the pleaded categories separately. On the face of the written judgment, the outcome is a dismissal of the claim in its entirety for jurisdictional reasons.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claim was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. It does not separate the jurisdiction ruling by individual claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the claim was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. It does not separate the jurisdiction ruling by individual claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.