Case 6019894/2025 · Employment Tribunal
C Anderson v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019894/2025
- Decision date
- 1 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Knowles Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not appear at the public video hearing at Leeds on 1 December 2025. The respondent was represented by Mr Gibson, solicitor.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, identified in the judgment as the rule concerning non-attendance. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, with written reasons to be provided only if requested within the specified period.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type reflected from the listing category; the judgment itself states only that the Claimant's claims are dismissed under Rule 47 for non-attendance. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim type and protected characteristic reflected from the listing category; the judgment itself states only that the Claimant's claims are dismissed under Rule 47 for non-attendance. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.