Case 6019902/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Eddie Parker v Bupa Occupational Health Limited RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019902/2024
- Decision date
- 20 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loraine Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Eddie Parker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Loraine, the Tribunal considered a series of complaints brought by Mr Eddie Parker against Bupa Occupational Health Limited concerning unauthorised deductions from wages and parallel breach of contract complaints. The Tribunal found that complaints relating to business and travel expenses, an unpaid bonus, reimbursement for a private medical insurance policy, and deductions for benefit in kind taxation related to private medical insurance were not well-founded and were dismissed.
The Tribunal upheld the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of a retained salary payment, finding that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's final pay in June 2024 in the sum of £797.10. By agreement, the complaint relating to holiday pay was also well-founded and succeeded, with the parties agreeing a day's pay of £232.04 and that £964.52 would be paid less necessary tax and NI deductions.
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £1,761.62 as the total gross sum deducted, with the Claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance as appropriate. The parallel breach of contract complaints in respect of the retained salary and holiday pay were dismissed because those claims had succeeded under s.13, and the remaining breach of contract complaints were dismissed as not well-founded.
Claims and outcomes
12 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of business and travel expenses — not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of an unpaid bonus payment — not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of a retained salary payment — well-founded and upheld. Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's final pay in June 2024 in the sum of £797.10. | Upheld | — | £797 |
| Holiday pay | Unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of holiday pay — by agreement, well-founded and succeeds. Parties agreed a day's pay at £232.04 and Respondent will pay £964.52 gross less tax and NI deductions. | Upheld | — | £965 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of reimbursement for a private medical insurance policy — not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,762
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.