Case 6019955/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Owen v Trivallis Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019955/2025
- Decision date
- 25 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Owen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr G Owen's unfair dismissal claim was well founded and succeeded. It found that he caused or contributed to his dismissal by blameworthy conduct and that it was just and equitable to reduce the basic and compensatory award payable to him by 80%.
The tribunal also found that Mr Owen was a person with a disability for the purposes of s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time. However, the claims of failure to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments under s.20/21 EqA 2010 and discrimination arising from disability under s.15 EqA 2010 were both not well founded and were dismissed.
By consent, the hearing was adjourned to allow the parties to implement agreed terms of settlement on remedy. The judgment records that either party could apply to restore the case for a further remedy hearing in default, and that if no application was made by 27 October 2025, the remedy claim would be dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal found the claimant caused or contributed to the dismissal by blameworthy conduct and said it was just and equitable to reduce any basic and compensatory award by 80%. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments under s.20/21 EqA 2010. The tribunal found this claim was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for discrimination arising from disability under s.15 EqA 2010. The tribunal found this claim was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.