Case 6019958/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Verano v OVO Energy Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6019958/2024
- Decision date
- 12 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Ms Ramsaran, Mrs Ratnayake-Kinglsey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Verano
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr A Verano was unfairly dismissed by OVO Energy Ltd and was subjected to discrimination arising from disability. It dismissed the complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments.
Remedy will be determined at a separate hearing listed in accordance with the tribunal's order of the same date. No monetary award is recorded. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; the written judgment does not set out the underlying factual findings or legal reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Remedy will be determined at a separate hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability. Remedy will be determined at a separate hearing. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.