Case 6019959/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Walsham v The Grind Coffee Kelham Island Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) STRIKE OUT WARNING Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019959/2024
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe document is a strike out warning issued in a claim by Ms J Walsham against The Grind Coffee Kelham Island Ltd, which is stated to be in creditors voluntary liquidation. Employment Judge Shepherd stated that he was considering striking out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The warning records that the claimant had failed to attend a hearing and had failed to comply with Tribunal orders. It also states that the claim was not being actively pursued, and gave the claimant until 23 June 2025 to object in writing or request a hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The document is a strike out warning under Rule 38. It states that Employment Judge Shepherd is considering striking out the claim because the claimant failed to attend a hearing, failed to comply with Tribunal orders, and the claim is not being actively pursued. It does not record a final strike out or adjudication of the working time claim. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.