Case 6020031/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Max Martin v ‘O Ver Borough Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6020031/2025
- Decision date
- 20 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Max Martin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against 'O Ver Borough Limited, whose name was amended in the judgment to reflect that it was in creditors' voluntary liquidation. The tribunal recorded that the respondent did not object to the amendment of its name.
The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages to be well-founded in respect of the period 1 to 6 February 2025. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant GBP 545.35 as the gross sum deducted, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
At the hearing, the claimant applied to amend his claim to add a complaint about alleged failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday pay. That application to amend was refused.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 to 6 February 2025. The claimant's application at the hearing to amend the claim to add accrued but untaken holiday pay was refused; that proposed complaint was not substantively adjudicated. | Upheld | — | £545 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £545
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.