Mr A Alexandropoulos v Advice UK — 2025

Case reference: 6020140/2024
Decision date: 19 May 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Gordon Walker

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr A Alexandropoulos

Respondent

Advice UK

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Gordon Walker, sitting alone at East London Hearing Centre on 19 May 2025, heard case number 6020140/2024. The claim was for breach of contract. The Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim because it had not been presented within the time limit in section 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994.

No monetary remedy was awarded in this case. The judgment also records that case number 6000908/2025, which concerns age and race discrimination, will proceed to a final hearing on 22, 23 and 24 October 2025.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the breach of contract claim because it was not presented within the time limit in section 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.