Case 6020194/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 6020194/2024
- Decision date
- 5 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing by CVP, the Tribunal considered the respondent's application for strike out of the claimant's claims for unfair dismissal and a redundancy payment.
The Tribunal held that the claimant did not have two years' continuous employment in respect of those claims. It therefore found that it had no jurisdiction to hear them, and the respondent's Rule 38 strike-out application succeeded because the claims had no reasonable prospect of success.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found it had no jurisdiction because the Claimant did not have two years' continuous employment; the claim was struck out under Rule 38 as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The Tribunal found it had no jurisdiction because the Claimant did not have two years' continuous employment; the claim was struck out under Rule 38 as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.