Case 6020199/2024 · Employment Tribunal
AB v A Company — 2026
- Case reference
- 6020199/2024
- Decision date
- 9 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bowen Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
AB
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that the complaints of direct discrimination, health and safety detriment, whistleblowing detriment, and breach of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal recorded that, at the relevant times from April 2022 to 29 November 2024, the claimant was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of ADHD. It also recorded the respondent's concession that the claimant was disabled at all relevant times because of ASD, GAD, and C-PTSD.
The judgment states that oral reasons were provided at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment states that a complaint of direct discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed upon withdrawal. The disability classification is inferred from the judgment's findings that the claimant was disabled at the relevant times and the listing category, but the withdrawn complaint wording itself does not restate the protected characteristic. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Other | Health and safety detriment under s.44 Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Whistleblowing detriment under s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Breach of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.44 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.