Case 6020202/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Haley v St Stephens Pre-School Community Interest Company CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 6020202/2025
- Decision date
- 30 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill Dated
Parties
3 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the London East Employment Tribunal on 30 May 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that the claim could properly be determined without a hearing. The hearing listed on 3 November 2025 was cancelled, and the respondent's name was amended to St Stephens Pre-School Community Interest Company.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £869.68 gross. It further found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £602.61. The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £903.92.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £2,376.21 in total. No working time or holiday pay component was separately addressed in the judgment text, and no reasons beyond the rule 22 determination were given.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages; respondent ordered to pay £869.68 gross. | Upheld | — | £870 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £602.61 awarded. | Upheld | — | £603 |
| Redundancy | Dismissed by reason of redundancy; statutory redundancy payment of £903.92 awarded. | Upheld | — | £904 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,376
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.